A further twist on the Myer Briggs

I recently completed this test which explores Jung dimensions of (I-E S-N F-T J-P), as to who I am, who I prefer to be, and what I am attracted to. 

The test can be completed here.

The results are shown below.

Actualized type: INTP

(who you are)

Introverted (I) 55% Extroverted (E) 45%

Intuitive (N) 68.57% Sensing (S) 31.43%

Thinking (T) 53.85% Feeling (F) 46.15%

Perceiving (P) 73.33% Judging (J) 26.67%

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.

Preferred type: ENTJ

(who you prefer to be)

Extroverted (E) 57.14% Introverted (I) 42.86%

Intuitive (N) 51.16% Sensing (S) 48.84%

Thinking (T) 56.25% Feeling (F) 43.75%

Judging (J) 51.28% Perceiving (P) 48.72%

ENTJ - "Field Marshall". The basic driving force and need is to lead. Tend to seek a position of responsibility and enjoys being an executive. 1.8% of total population.

Attraction type: INFJ

(who you are attracted to)

Introverted (I) 60% Extroverted (E) 40%

Intuitive (N) 69.44% Sensing (S) 30.56%

Feeling (F) 59.09% Thinking (T) 40.91%

Judging (J) 66.67% Perceiving (P) 33.33%

INFJ - "Author". Strong drive and enjoyment to help others. Complex personality. 1.5% of total population.

Reflection 

I've completed this test numerous times and know most of the questions back to front, so there could be some bias going on, but I did complete the test with my gut instinct. The results are surprisingly accurate and consistent with what I usually get on tests. It is still important however to keep in mind that this is pop psychology, and that the results are not statistically valid, and rather act as a stereotype, in which we believe in those stereotypes because of the forer effect which entails believing in general traits that everyone has. However, I've been looking into the functions of "dominant, auxiliary, tertiary and inferior" and found it's made general sense to me as an quick and easy way to understand people and I've been trying to cross compare to find patterns.

1. My introversion / extroversion is usually quite close, so it's accurate.
2. My intuitiveness is usually quite high over sensing.
3. My thinking and feeling is quite close, which sounds about right.
4. My perceiving is quite high, which is extremely accurate.

My preferred type also matches well with the theory. Theory says that I can further develop my functions from observing well developed ENTJs. It makes so much sense now why I always admire executives and really want to be one, but I've noticed I just struggle to become one and I always end up trying too hard.

I'm not surprised that the test shows that I'm attracted to INFJ's. I noticed I am naturally drawn and attracted to complex personalities with strong altruistic and benevolent values. I always had this irresistible pull towards judgers, which I didn't know before, but now that I've understood the MBTI, it makes more sense. But it's definitely those with strong altruistic and benevolent values that causes butterflies, makes my legs go jelly and I completely lose myself into a dream state just from their presence.

I noticed that I am deeply attracted to goodness, but also rebelliousness as well. There's just something enticing about rebellious girls who don't live and adhere to the expectations and pressures of society. They are usually aware that most things in the world are merely perceptual constructs of society, and thus they exist in a timeless sphere and create their own abstract or rational perception of the world independent of the commonly accepted pop-culture views of society. That abstractness and eccentricity is irresistibly alluring.

The only sensing type that I've been attracted to is the ISFJ, based on personal experience and observations. I believe it's their sensing component which is very systematic and maintenance oriented, which is my complete opposite given that I am intuitive. They are very grounded in the present and are value driven. So we end up being a very compatible couple, in that one person helps maintains and keeps things organised and is very practical and keeps an eye out on the small details, while the other is the thought powerhouse, the big picture thinker, that is filled with endless and useless information, but also full of goals and dreams to be achieved. This is truly a combination of two different functions that leads to a practical compatibility, of which can really achieve much and be of success.

However, I do really admire most intuitive feelers (NF) and can get along with them. Usually with intuitive thinkers (NT), there is always some friction of which I can never figure out why, as it seems that long distance debate, criticism and analysis occurs on things, and sometimes we end up with a certain conflict, but if our views are the same or that they are superior in their thinking and logic, I have the utmost respect. I have the most respect for intuitive thinkers (NT) for they like myself, are always on a pursuit for truth and knowledge, one of values I highly respect moreso than material possessions and social status which are common for sensing types (S). They are willing to sacrifice the many luxuries of life, while pursuing a cause much greater than themselves which is also common for intuitive feelers (NF) who have very complex, deep and strong values that they are guided by. I believe that I may also have traits of intuitive feeler, as there are many things which I feel deeply about as I noticed I am usually driven by certain values, rather than following an objective goal independent of values, it is usually a mix of both.

An Eye for Personality

How does one perceive the world and make decisions? 

The largest project that I have been working on this year is gaining a thorough understanding of the Myer-Briggs Type Indicator, and to be able to quickly identify patterns and interconnecting links between interests, needs, values, careers, motivation, decisions and even down to the way people dress, walk and their facial expressions and movements. 

The Myer-Briggs is a four functional psychological functions which were extrapolated upon Carl Gustav Jung's typological theories in his book Psychological types.  

The four main function that we have are:

1. Extraversion vs. Introversion 

2. Sensing vs. Intuition 

3. Feeling vs. Thinking

4. Perceiving vs. Judging

Individuals are born, and develop certain ways of perceiving and deciding. Here are the summary of each function:

Why is it important?

It is frequently used in pedagogy (education), career counselling, team building, group dynamics, professional development, marketing, family business, leadership training, executive coaching, life coaching, personal development and marriage counselling. 

Extraversion vs. Introversion

Extraversion:

• Operate in the external world of behaviour, action, people and things
• Draw energy from action (Prefers to act, reflect, then act further)
• Inactivity leads to decline in motivation
• Flow directed outward toward people and objects
• Action oriented
• Breadth of knowledge and influence
• Frequent interaction
• Initiating, expressive, gregarious, active, enthusiastic 
• Outgoing or people's person
• Comfortable in groups
• Wide range of friends and know lots of people
• Jump too quickly into activity without thinking it over

Introversion 

• Internal world of ideas and reflection
• Expend energy through action (Prefer to reflect, then act, then reflect)
• Energy gained through quiet time alone, away from activity 
• Directed inward towards concepts and ideas
• Thought oriented
• Depth of knowledge and influence
• Receiving, contained, intimate, reflective, quiet
• Reflective, reserved
• Prefer just to know a few people well

Sensing vs. Intuition 

The gathering of information, how that information is understood and intepreted.

Sensing

• Trust information that is in present, tangible and concrete
• Understood by five senses
• Distrust hunches
• Details and facts
• Concrete, realistic, practical, experiential, traditional
• Remember events as snapshots
• Solve problem by working through facts
• Pragmatic and look at bottom line
• Facts to bigger picture

Intuition 

• Trust information that is more abstract and theoretical
• Association with other information (wider context or pattern)
• Interested in future possibilities 
• Underlying theory and principles
• Abstract, imaginative, conceptual, theoretical, original
• Solve problem by leaping between different ideas and possibilities
• Interested in doing things new and different
• See big picture, then find out facts

Thinking vs. Feeling

The decision-making preferences. 

Thinking

• Decides things from more detached standpoint
• Reasonable, logical, casual, consistent decisions following rules 
• Logical, reasonable, questioning, critical, tough
• Objective truth, natural at deductive reasoning 
• Technical or scientific fields with logic
• Task-oriented, uncaring and indifferent

Feeling 

• Come to decision by association or empathizing with situation
• Looking from "inside" to achieve, greatest harmony, consensus and fit
• Consider the needs of the people involved
• Empathetic, compassionate, accommodating, accepting, tender
• Place an emphasis on issues and causes that can be personalized 
• People or communications orientation
• Tactful vs. Cold Truth
• Idealistic, mushy or indirect

Judging and Perceiving

Extraverts (E) have a dominant function when paired with (J) or (P). Introverts (I) have an auxiliary function. 

Perceiving

• Keep decision open, staying open to final decision in order to get more information 
• Flourish in flexible learning environment stimulated by new and exciting ideas
• Flexible and adaptable lifestyle
• Open to new experiences and information 
• Stay open to respond to whatever happens
• Loose and casual, minimal plans
• Work in bursts of energy
• Stimulated by approaching deadline
• Adaptable, relaxed, disorganized, carefree, spontaneous, changes tracks midway, procrastinates

Judging

• Planned, orderly way of life
• Information gathered is organized and structured
• Motivated to complete assignments to gain closure
• Structure and decided lifestyle
• Things must be settled and organized
• Task oriented, things to do, get work done before playing
• Decisive, controlled, finishing, organised, scheduled, quick at tasks, closure

What is interesting is that Isabel Myers was working on an more advanced scoring system before her death and includes more subscales of which includes:

Comfort-Discomfort (Links to neuroticism)
Guarded-Optimistic (also T/F)

Defiant-Compliant (T/F)

Carefree-Worried (T/F)

Decisive-Ambivalent (J/P)

Intepreid-Inhibited (E/I)

Leader-follower (E/I)

Proactive-Distractible (J/P)

What I've may have missed in my research is that the the best judge is ourselves, in that a Reported Type may not be representative of the truth. People often mistake that a type is also a trait, in that Person A is 'thinking' person, therefore he is good at 'thinking', which is irrespective of the truth. It is preference rather than aptitude that is being explored here. What many people mistake is that one type is better or worse than the other, but in reality, they are all gifts that are differing. 

I have treaded dangerously on ethical grounds in that I may have been unethically compelling people to take the Myer-Briggs Type Indicator test, when it should always be taken voluntarily. I have also unethically been experimenting and intentionally interrogating individuals by exploring and testing their functions without their consent. I am deeply sorry for the people that I have experimented with in the past given year. However given this, if I were to tell others about this test as I previously have to some individuals, they may become guarded, paranoid or suspicious of your motives, intentions and actions. I am not a trained administrator, so I have also given very dodgy and possibly incorrect feedback. 

What I also need to dwell into is the type dynamics. In accordance to my main source, Wikipedia, there has been little empirical support to substantiate its viability as a scientific theory. In the early stages of life, there is one function that is the most dominant. The secondary of auxiliary function is evident during teenage years. The tertiary function during midlife, and the inferior function remains least consciously developed. The inferior being the most associated with the unconscious (most evident in situation such as high stress).

However, it has been criticise that type dynamics has persistent logical problems, and relies more on anecdotal problems, and fails most efficacy tests. It does not reveal the real behaviour of people. I have yet to explore the functions from dominant, auxiliary, tertiary and inferior in detail. 

Functions

1. Dominant 
2. Auxillary
3. Tetiary
4. Inferior

There are some correlations to other instruments which include:

Keirsey temperament (SP, SJ, NF and NT) and the Big Five (extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability)

• Extraversion correlates with E-I (0.74)
• Openness correlates with S-N (0.72)
• Agreeableness correlates with T-F (0.44)
• Conscientiousness correlates J-P (0.49)

Another interesting result is that personality disorders correlates modestly with INTP and ISTJ (OCD). 

Criticism

Statistical validity has been the major issue. There has been inconsistent findings between type preferences and managerial effectiveness. The reliability of the test is quite low, and the test is subject to falsifiability in that a statement, hypothesis or theory has inherent possibility to prove it false which results in confirmation bias when interpreting the results. I have fallen victim to this as many of the things make rational sense or describe me, but at the same time it can also describe the majority of other people as it is inherently difficult to prove false.

Summary and Conclusion 

Hopefully, I am able to devise a better test that will explain things in clearer, I have been exploring many different personalities and finding patterns and consistencies. 

More to come... from this, I'd like to extrapolate some theories that I have come up with that may link with certain personality types such as interests, style of walking, handwriting, preferred dress-styles, ease-of-influence, music preference, romanticism, worldviews, political preference, muscle structure... the list goes on.

INTP out.

Note: I purposely titled this article as an INFP would, using metaphor and hidden meanings, but given the discussion and pondering with some logical inconsistencies, this article may seem to be written by an INFP trying to gain a better understanding of the world. Given my close T and F preferences, and E and I preferences, I believe that this creates a complex character that is difficult to interpret and understand. 

Standing EGG - 햇살이 아파 with 한소현 (of 3rd Coast)

Skypoint Q1

Skypoint Q1

Transfixed by Beauty

Transfixed by Beauty

Lake Moogerah, QLD